From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19976 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2003 19:32:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19969 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2003 19:32:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2003 19:32:00 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id CAAF0D2DAF; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:32:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language Message-ID: <20030911193159.GF945@gnat.com> References: <20030910015400.GS423@gnat.com> <20030911180920.GD945@gnat.com> <3F60CB0C.5060504@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F60CB0C.5060504@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 > I've been wondering if this language stuff was going to interact badly > with breakpoints. Anyway, is it possible to create an equivalent gcj > test case since gcj is likely more accessable to developers? It's probably possible, but I don't have gcj and I've never programed in Java. So I'd like to leave this part to the contributors that do use Java. -- Joel