From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26754 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2003 21:03:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26743 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 21:03:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (66.187.237.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 21:03:37 -0000 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8AL3Z2m016755 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:03:35 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h8AL3ZrL016753 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:03:35 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:03:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/6.0] Better handle unspecified CFI values Message-ID: <20030910210335.GA16747@redhat.com> References: <3F593115.4030407@redhat.com> <20030906213351.GA1101@nevyn.them.org> <3F5D1AE7.7020306@redhat.com> <20030909033053.GA8904@nevyn.them.org> <20030910194754.GC15867@redhat.com> <20030910195306.GA10566@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030910195306.GA10566@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It computes "the address in which the given register contents are > found". That's not ambiguous, and that's precisely how GCC uses it: > _Unwind_SetGRPtr (context, i, (void *) val); Huh. I coulda sworn there was a way to do values. Oh well. r~