Re: [RFA] ARM : prologue scan

Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-07-21T14:31:53Z

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 04:27:42PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote:
> This patch adds the interpretation of the missing "add" (resp. "sub")
> instruction. I have run the testsuite with the simulator, and I
> found no regression; but there was a lot of test that failed, so I have
> some suspicion on my setup. Can someone give me the average success/failure
> on this target, or (even better :-) test it on his own setup?
> Is the arm simulator (HEAD) reliable?

I was getting about fifty failures, mostly from a testsuite bug in
fileio.exp, IIRC.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer