From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7722 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2003 21:29:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7714 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 21:29:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Sep 2003 21:29:24 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h88LTMB3026257; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:29:22 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h88LTMHK011772; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:29:22 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h88LTMMf011771; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:29:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:29:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309082129.h88LTMMf011771@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] avoid 'gamma' function name X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 > Sounds reasonable to me. I'm 99.9% sure you're right about the GCC > bug, too - at least if gcc HEAD defaults to gnu99 mode? gcc HEAD -std=c99 compiles my test program with 'gamma' just fine. So does gcc HEAD -std=c89, for that matter. So it looks like the particular name 'gamma' is a gnu extension and is enabled by default. Bit my ankle, but easy to deal with. Michael C