From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3924 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2003 03:01:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3917 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 03:01:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Sep 2003 03:01:54 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 19wCHn-00036N-Lx; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 23:01:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 03:01:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com, ac131313@redhat.com, cgd@broadcom.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl, msnyder@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:threads] Report when using libthread_db Message-ID: <20030908030151.GA11891@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ezannoni@redhat.com, ac131313@redhat.com, cgd@broadcom.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl, msnyder@redhat.com References: <200309080228.h882SkPU027270@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309080228.h882SkPU027270@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:28:46PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > Somebody's mailer expanded the tabs to spaces, which made me > do a little more work. No big deal. And it needs a ChangeLog. > > Other than that, this patch works fine in my test bed. It fixes the > problem all right. > > I would write it differently, with the "Reading symbols ..." as a common > part and then a "(|Using host libthread_db ...)". But I'd like to just > get it done and move on to the next problem. > > Recommended for approval, on HEAD only, not the branch. > The new message is not on the branch so this is not needed > on the branch. Before we go ahead with this, I'd like to point out that the new message looks pretty ugly, IMVHO. Before we add it into the test scripts as-is can we get it printed on a separate line? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer