From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28095 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2003 05:01:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28087 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2003 05:01:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta02bw.bigpond.com) (144.135.24.138) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Sep 2003 05:01:28 -0000 Received: from bubble.modra.org ([144.135.24.69]) by mta02bw.email.bigpond.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with SMTP id <0HKS005VC0GHR2@mta02bw.email.bigpond.com> for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Sat, 06 Sep 2003 14:57:54 +1000 (EST) Received: from cpe-144-136-188-60.sa.bigpond.net.au ([144.136.188.60]) by bwmam01bpa.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_3_2c 8/476476); Sat, 06 Sep 2003 14:57:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 18463 invoked by uid 179); Sat, 06 Sep 2003 04:57:53 +0000 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 05:01:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra Subject: Re: [RFA] BFD: Add HPPA machine code names In-reply-to: <20030905173943.GG932@gnat.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-followup-to: Joel Brobecker , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-id: <20030906045753.GJ1443@bubble.modra.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i References: <20030905173943.GG932@gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:39:43AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > * archures.c: Add new machine names for hppa. > * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate. > * cpu-hppa.c: Use the new machine names. > OK. I think you'll find a number of other places in the hppa support could use these defines too. > BTW: I think I have checkin priviledges to binutils, but it's more of a > side-effect of being a write-after-approval contributor. According > to binutils/MAINTAINERS, simply having checkin priviledges puts > me in the write-after-approval category for binutils as well. Is that > correct? Yes. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre