From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28917 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2003 15:56:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28641 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 15:55:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2003 15:55:53 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 95B42D2DAF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] ARM : prologue scan Message-ID: <20030905155548.GQ925@gnat.com> References: <20030722114709.GB3100@act-europe.fr> <200309051014.h85AEGl21565@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309051014.h85AEGl21565@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 > Supporting nested functions is at best a gcc extension (at worst it's > a gcc hack). I agree if you are refering to C. But nested functions are legal in Ada. Are there any other languages that GCC supports where nested functions are also legal? -- Joel