From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 865 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2003 22:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 857 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2003 22:56:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk) (195.92.193.210) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 22:56:30 -0000 Received: from modem-3635.bonobo.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.134.62.51] helo=buzzard.buzzard.freeserve.co.uk) by cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19uK4Y-0007Yb-Hr; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 23:56:27 +0100 Received: from buzzard (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buzzard.buzzard.freeserve.co.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h82MqQum001042; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 23:52:26 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200309022252.h82MqQum001042@buzzard.buzzard.freeserve.co.uk> To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Richard.Earnshaw@buzzard.freeserve.co.uk Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@buzzard.freeserve.co.uk Subject: Re: [RFA] Repost ARM frame patches In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:49:56 EDT." <20030829014956.GA30404@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:56:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Daniel, My appologies for not reviewing this before. Just way too much day job... It looks fine to me (at least, it seems better than what's there at present). My only question is, once we start using the dwarf2 unwinder, can it cope with the fact that gcc currently does not emit frame unwind information for Thumb code? (ie can it handle a mix of code that uses dwarf2 and traditional unwinding?) R.