From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3381 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2003 10:23:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3372 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 10:23:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 10:23:38 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h7TANUFd006363; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:23:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h7TANTSr034382; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:23:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6/Submit) id h7TANQge034379; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:23:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:23:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200308291023.h7TANQge034379@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: ac131313@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3F4EA302.90407@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:49:06 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Add regcache_raw_{supply,collect} References: <200308282202.h7SM2Q2k032444@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3F4EA302.90407@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00527.txt.bz2 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:49:06 -0400 From: Andrew Cagney BTW, in the ARI, I've the comment: supply register Replace supply_register() with something involving the regcache, or a TPID so yep. Missed that. Anyway, I think supplying the regcache is better than supplying a TPID. Can you at the same time re-implement supply_register and regcache_collect to use these new methods. I'll then add supply_register and regcache_collect to the deprecate list. This is not entirely without a risk. I want to keep the new interfaces "legacy-free", so they're not doing exactly the same thing as the old interfaces. Therefore I chose to re-implement the old interfaces in a seperate commit. The new functions are checked in now. Mark