From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16796 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2003 19:37:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16788 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 19:37:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2003 19:37:44 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 19sSaW-0007At-2E for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:37:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/testcase] fix gdb.objc/basicclass.exp Message-ID: <20030828193744.GA27550@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <013e01c341d9$b364eb30$5169910a@KEI> <20030707141226.GB27227@nevyn.them.org> <005101c344ec$5bfbb8e0$5169910a@KEI> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005101c344ec$5bfbb8e0$5169910a@KEI> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00516.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:00:43AM +0900, Kei Sakamoto wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:09:36PM +0900, Kei Sakamoto wrote: > > > The attached patch fixes gdb.objc.basicclass.exp. > > > > > > The current test always fail with sim because of libobjc's error. > > > > > > (gdb) PASS: gdb.objc/basicclass.exp: continue until method breakpoint > > > run > > > The program being debugged has been started already. > > > Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y > > > Starting program: > > > /project/m32r-tools/insight-20030703/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.objc/basicclass > > > Virtual memory exhausted > > > > > > *** EXIT code 4242 > > > > > > Program exited with code 0157255. > > > [Switching to process 0] > > > (gdb) FAIL: gdb.objc/basicclass.exp: resetting breakpoints when rerunning > > > > > > I assume this is not libobjc's bug. Please tell me if my > > > assumption is wrong. > > > > > > Anyway, I inserted load command before run command. I checked > > > this patch with m32r-elf, arm-elf, and sh-elf. > > > > You missed the patch - would you mind posting it? > > I'm sorry about that. This is the patch. > > Kei I've just posted an alternate patch for this, which doesn't hardcode the string "sim". -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer