From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13248 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2003 14:44:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13228 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 14:44:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2003 14:44:57 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 19sO1A-0000ob-Ig for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:44:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] IBM6000_TARGET is wrong for NetBSD/powerpc Message-ID: <20030828144456.GD2731@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030828142351.GB2731@nevyn.them.org> <3B178BEA-D965-11D7-BD43-000A957650EC@wasabisystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B178BEA-D965-11D7-BD43-000A957650EC@wasabisystems.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00509.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 07:38:03AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 07:23 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 06:13:38PM -0400, Nathan J. Williams wrote: > >> > >>I just remembered to dig this "local" fix out of the NetBSD > >>tree. NetBSD doen't want the IBM6000_TARGET-munged section > >>calculations either. The comment is cribbed from the similar #undef in > >>tm-linux.h. > >> > >>I'd appreciate it if someone could check and commit this. > > > >Hi Jason, > > > >Did you see this patch? It looks right to me, but you're the NetBSD > >maintainer :) > > Hi, sorry, I have had little time to read GDB-related mail. I need to > trim back my travel schedule, sigh... > > Yah, the patch looks fine to me. Please check it in. > > Sorry for the delay. OK, I've checked this in - I believe it is sufficiently obvious to not require any copyright assignment. It's certainly obvious to me after seeing the comment! -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer