Re: [toplevel] GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-27T19:14:53Z

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 02:17:53PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > DJ, I know you asked for this to be added to acx.m4 instead. Unfortunately,
> > it uses constructs that autoconf 2.13 can't parse, thus breaking
> > regenerating the toplevel configure. So I put it in a separate file after
> > all.
>
> No version conditionals?

There's probably a way to do it, but my m4 fu is too weak to figure it
out.

> > Tested, along with the patches to follow momentarily, on an extensive
> > collection of targets (all --build=i686-linux). Is this OK?
>
> Ok.
>
> /me wonders if function-per-file is a good precident to start.

No opinion here. Zack seemed in favor of this but I don't recall
why...

Checked in to gcc and src.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer