From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29879 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2003 19:48:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29859 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2003 19:48:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2003 19:48:56 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7OJmqWn020493; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:48:52 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7OJmqHK018116; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:48:52 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7OJmqCx018115; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 15:48:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 19:48:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200308241948.h7OJmqCx018115@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fix Java PR gdb/1322 (was Re: [rfa/doc] Document pr gdb/1322 in PROBLEMS) X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00427.txt.bz2 drow> Could someone test that it fixes the Java problems on HEAD? It works for me. It passes the "continue to exit" test in gdb.java/jmisc1.exp. (That's the specific test for this bug). I didn't do a full before-and-after with this patch, my system is busy today. But it looks like it could not possibly cause any regressions, It's really just changing the order of two tests that already happen: an fde==NULL test and the test inside the SECT_OFF_TEXT macro. Recommended for approval in gdb HEAD. Michael C * dwarf2-frame.c (dwarf2_frame_find_fde): Check whether any FDEs are available before calling SECT_OFF_TEXT.