From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31080 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2003 22:47:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31070 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2003 22:47:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Aug 2003 22:47:46 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h7LMlP0j000251; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:47:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h7LMlPJh000376; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:47:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6/Submit) id h7LMlPg4000373; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 00:47:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200308212247.h7LMlPg4000373@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: ac131313@redhat.com CC: msnyder@redhat.com, cgd@broadcom.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec@shout.net In-reply-to: <3F454362.50609@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:10:42 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa:threads] Report when using libthread_db References: <3F3004F7.6090003@redhat.com> <3F32AF3A.1080106@redhat.com> <3F33B8ED.1000908@redhat.com> <3F454362.50609@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:10:42 -0400 From: Andrew Cagney [I've committed this to cagney_x86i386-20030821-branch, debugging threads without this is a pain] [Probably highly dependent on what version of SCO Un^H^H^H^H^H^H Linux, you're using.] Michael, Mark, OK for 6.0 branch (probably a bit late) and/or mainline? Doesn't seem too risky to me. Threads debugging has its quirks, and probably isn't working flawlessly for most people anyway. Mark