From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc] Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030820164441.GA27005@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F41100F.1080706@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:42:39PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> What does "maint print [raw-]registers" look like?
>
> >(gdb) i all-registers
> > zero at v0 v1 a0 a1 a2
> > a3
> > R0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > 00000000
> > t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6
> > t7
> > R8 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > 00000000
> > s0 s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6
> > s7
> > R16 7fff7eaf 7fff7dcc 7fff7dd4 00000003 004059cc 10012808 00000000
> > 00000000
> > t8 t9 k0 k1 gp sp s8
> > ra
> > R24 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 7fff7df0 00000000
> > 00000000
> > zero at v0 v1 a0 a1
> > 00000000 0067194b 00000004 80279720 00000020 2aac0ac0
> > a2: 0xffffffff flt: nan dbl: nan
> > a3: 0xffffffff flt: nan
> > t0: 0xffffffff flt: nan dbl: nan
> > t1: 0xffffffff flt: nan
> > t2: 0xffffffff flt: nan dbl: nan
> > t3: 0xffffffff flt: nan
> >
> >
> >Obviously the registers aren't where it expects them to be.
Thanks for the pointer, and sorry for the noise. The problem was a
local patch which added MIPS_REGISTER_NAMES for GNU/Linux; it recently
changed to start at 32 and I still had the first 32 registers listed.
After 6.0 I'll try to flush my MIPS queue.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-20 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-27 18:55 Steve Watt
2003-07-27 21:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-28 15:37 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-28 16:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-18 17:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-18 17:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-20 16:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-07-31 21:00 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-21 22:57 Steve Watt
2003-07-27 13:50 ` [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: " Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030820164441.GA27005@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox