From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6801 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2003 19:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6779 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2003 19:15:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2003 19:15:43 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19o6WY-0001XQ-GM for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 15:15:38 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 19:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch, rfa:doco, rfa:ppc] Generic red zone arch method Message-ID: <20030816191538.GA5883@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3F3E80F0.2070607@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F3E80F0.2070607@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 03:07:28PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > Ref: Skip the "red zone" on AMD64 > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-08/msg00092.html > > The attached implements the suggested fix in that thread. For x86-64, > it gives the same results as the original change (need more test cases). > > Eli, doco ok? > > Kevin, for PPC64 and AIX I pulled the numbers from ABI doco. It isn't > yet tested. For PPC64 I've too many other failures for results to be > meaningful, and for AIX probably won't happen :-(. > > The remaining bits (framework and x86-64) I'll commit in a few days. > Andrew I'm sure there's a reason this won't work but... is gdbarch_frame_align called from anywhere else, i.e. that should not include the red zone? Why isn't skipping the red zone there sufficient? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer