From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20731 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2003 18:18:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20724 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 18:18:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2003 18:18:31 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7EIIPr3020792; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:18:25 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7EIIPHK032425; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:18:25 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7EIIP4N032424; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:18:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:18:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200308141818.h7EIIP4N032424@duracef.shout.net> To: carlton@kealia.com Subject: Re: [rfa] create testsuite/gdb.cp directory Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 dc> Why not move all the existing scripts to the new directory? That's dc> what I'd prefer. I'm okay with that. But it would kill the cvs history of the tests, and it would hurt people doing 'diff' on test runs from before and after the change (such as gdb 6 to HEAD, after gdb 6 is released). It wouldn't hurt my test bed because I use a 1000-line Perl script, not diff, so I can adapt to test name changes. So I'll subdivide my proposal: (1) Create new directory gdb.cp (2) Move all existing tests from gdb.c++ to gdb.cp I have no objection to (2). But if anyone objects to (2), then I still want to do (1), with or without (2). Michael C