From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9882 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2003 17:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9875 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 17:49:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2003 17:49:26 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h78HnOS4002276; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:49:24 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h78HnOHK016413; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:49:24 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h78HnOGU016412; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:49:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:49:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200308081749.h78HnOGU016412@duracef.shout.net> To: jjohnstn@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: modernization of ia64-tdep.c with new frame model for gdb-6.0 branch Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 > === gdb Summary === > > # of expected passes 5197 > # of unexpected failures 28 > # of unexpected successes 2 > # of expected failures 12 > # of known failures 1 > # of unresolved testcases 1 > # of unsupported tests 1 That is light on the # of expected passes. For comparison, I am getting 9000 expected passes with gdb HEAD and gdb gdb_6_0-branch on native i686-pc-linux-gnu. Can you check your gdb.sum file and see if there are any ERROR lines or WARNING lines in it? Unfortunately, the summary does not include counts for those. Or it could be that ia64 doesn't run as many tests as i686. But 3800 missing tests is a LOT of tests. Michael C