From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12746 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 21:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12731 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 21:35:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 21:35:54 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6TLZqin026444; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:35:52 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6TLZqHK017921; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:35:52 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6TLZqNs017920; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:35:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:35:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200307292135.h6TLZqNs017920@duracef.shout.net> To: ezannoni@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite cleanups (part 2) Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2 eza> [PS. I assume I used the correct autoconf, but I am nost sure: I used the eza> autoconf-000227 snapshot]. ms> In view of the large diffs in configure, I suspect this is indeed the ms> wrong version of autoconf. The rest of the change is approved. If you ms> don't easily solve the autoconf issue, you might consider leaving ms> configure alone -- it's just an extra test... A little sniffing indicates that the last commit to 'configure.in' used autoconf 2.13 to generate 'configure'. That's where the diff is coming from. So either the blessed version has changed, or the last commit to 'configure.in' was done with the wrong autoconf. I agree it might be useful to split the patch, if we can't get a quick resolution to "which autoconf is blessed". Michael C