From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32450 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 21:24:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32430 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 21:24:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 21:24:30 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6TLOSin023513; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:24:29 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6TLOSHK017672; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:24:28 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6TLOSNa017671; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:24:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:24:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200307292124.h6TLOSNa017671@duracef.shout.net> To: ezannoni@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com Subject: Re: tls test maintainer, was Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb.threads/tls.{exp,c} fixes Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00526.txt.bz2 Oh right, I just looked in MAINTAINERS and realize that I should have sent it to Michael S as well! So Elena, does that mean this patch is formally approved? Michael C