From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30932 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2003 02:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30925 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2003 02:38:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 2003 02:38:29 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19gxu8-0002DO-MQ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:38:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, fedor@doc.com Subject: Re: RFA symtab: Fix for PR c++/1267 ("next" and shared libraries) Message-ID: <20030728023828.GA8486@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com, fedor@doc.com References: <20030719181817.GA11670@nevyn.them.org> <20030721125337.GA23055@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:59:27PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > For the trunk, put it in, definitely. Done. > For 6.0, could you test it on a COFF toolchain, and on some non-GNU > toolchain? It would be nice to have those three PR's closed in 6.0. With some help, I've done this. Solaris CC, no regressions; sh-coff, no regressions (but crappy test results - 671 failures). If nothing shows up on the trunk this week, I'll move it over. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer