From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11461 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2003 01:00:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11454 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2003 01:00:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 2003 01:00:06 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19gwMw-0000PV-H1 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 21:00:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 01:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Some expect cleanups for the threads tests Message-ID: <20030728010006.GA1503@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030726160438.GA1513@nevyn.them.org> <16163.1777.606195.333160@localhost.redhat.com> <20030726224952.GA13161@nevyn.them.org> <16163.3960.590580.651826@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16163.3960.590580.651826@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 07:32:08PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Oh, ok. I only have a 0-1 configuration here. An old system with > nothing that supports TLS, and a new system with all the bits. > > Maybe add your above explanation as a comment. Otherwise the test looks odd. Checked in with that change, and the print-threads.exp bit on the branch. One more down... -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer