From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3180 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2003 17:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3173 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2003 17:31:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2003 17:31:48 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6QHVjgX029112; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:31:45 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6QHVjHK022560; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:31:45 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6QHVj1X022559; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:31:45 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:31:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200307261731.h6QHVj1X022559@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Some expect cleanups for the threads tests Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2 drow writes: > These patches fix some testsuite problems on my setup - compiler and > assembler both support TLS, but the C library doesn't. I think you get a > different error (earlier) if the kernel doesn't support TLS; I'll have to > check at some point. Oh, cool. I'll throw this on my test bed and see if it's equal or better in all configurations. I build my own gcc and binutils, but always use the system glibc (2.2.93-5-rh, on red hat linux 8), so this will be good for me. Michael C === 2003-07-26 Daniel Jacobowitz * gdb.threads/print-threads.exp (test_all_threads): Loosen KFAIL pattern. * gdb.threads/tls-shared.exp: Don't use gdb_suppress_entire_file. * gdb.threads/tls.exp: Recognize one case of the host library not supporting TLS.