From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21338 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2003 16:20:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21328 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2003 16:20:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2003 16:20:22 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19g5Ir-000093-2t; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:20:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA symtab: Fix for PR c++/1267 ("next" and shared libraries) Message-ID: <20030725162020.GA324@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200307251615.h6PGFFl0002783@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307251615.h6PGFFl0002783@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:15:15PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > Off topic thought: would it be hard to enhance gcc so that it > can generate coff (and mdebug) on native i686-pc-linux-gnu? > > Then I could add these formats to my test bed. The interest isn't in coff debugging info, but in COFF (rather than ELF) binaries. But the answer is yes, it would be hard. And I'd rather they silently die off. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer