From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13821 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2003 12:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13812 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2003 12:58:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2003 12:58:56 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian)) id 19g29t-0005I2-UL for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:58:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA symtab: Fix for PR c++/1267 ("next" and shared libraries) Message-ID: <20030725125853.GA18444@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030719181817.GA11670@nevyn.them.org> <20030721125337.GA23055@nevyn.them.org> <20030724205839.GA1919@nevyn.them.org> <2110-Fri25Jul2003090409+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2110-Fri25Jul2003090409+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00448.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:58:40 -0400 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > > > For 6.0, could you test it on a COFF toolchain, and on some non-GNU > > > toolchain? It would be nice to have those three PR's closed in 6.0. > > > > I no longer have access to any non-GNU toolchains. I'll try to build a > > COFF simulator target and give it a whirl, though... > > You could build a cross DJGPP version. DJGPP supports COFF if you > compile with -gcoff. Yes - unfortunately there's no simulator, so I couldn't test it. I tried my usual COFF targets: arm-coff did not build GCC, and sh-coff built but the testsuite results were terrible (1680 failures even without my patch). I give up - I can't test it on a COFF system. Adam's results on Solaris were perfect, however - no regressions except for an expect fluke in one of the prompt tests. Thoughts? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer