From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7594 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2003 18:47:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7587 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2003 18:47:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2003 18:47:57 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19f2Am-0000NW-00; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:47:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix info address for thread local vars Message-ID: <20030722184739.GA402@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Elena Zannoni , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200307211955.h6LJtBPA022135@duracef.shout.net> <16157.34061.373493.463025@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16157.34061.373493.463025@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:40:13PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > > Hi Elena, > > > > > I am also really tempted to commit the tls tests (to the mailine > > > only), otherwise, the tls feature will bitrot. I'll work through > > > refining the tests once they are in. > > > > Could you file a PR like "tls tests not ready for prime time yet" > > and then shovel in a bunch of setup_kfail? > > > > It's cheesy but it might be better than letting the tests bit rot. > > What do people think? > > > > I'll even volunteer to sprinkle in the setup_kfail's if people > > think this is a useful idea. > > > > Michael C > > > OK, after the commits I get these errors on a RHL system with all the > bits installed: > > Running /home/ezannoni/gdb-sources/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/tls.exp ... > FAIL: gdb.threads/tls.exp: info address me > > === gdb Summary === > > # of expected passes 59 > # of unexpected failures 1 > > > Running /home/ezannoni/gdb-sources/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/tls-shared.exp ... > > === gdb Summary === > > # of expected passes 9 > > > That failure is due to some other lossage with info address. > I think we need a test for info address in the testsuite.... > > > info address me > Symbol "me" is a variable with complex or multiple locations (DWARF2). > (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/tls.exp: info address me > > > OK, should I xfail/kfail it? I'll create a PR for this. Sounds like a good idea. Kfail, I think. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer