From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24201 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2003 19:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24194 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 19:43:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2003 19:43:10 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6HJh76m004948; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:43:07 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6HJh7HK017899; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:43:07 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6HJh7H7017898; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:43:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:43:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200307171943.h6HJh7H7017898@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:dwarf2] Use frame_unwind_address_in_block X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 Works for me with dwarf-2, but stabs+ is still broken. No regressions though. I tested this in mainline with: native i686-pc-linux-gnu gcc 2.95.3, gcc 3.3, gcc HEAD dwarf-2 and stabs+ Michael C === 2003-07-16 Andrew Cagney * dwarf2-frame.c (dwarf2_frame_sniffer): Use frame_unwind_address_in_block, instead of frame_pc_unwind. (dwarf2_frame_cache): Ditto.