From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13857 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2003 16:05:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13608 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2003 16:05:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO darkstar.welcomehome.org) (192.203.188.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2003 16:05:03 -0000 Received: (from rob@localhost) by darkstar.welcomehome.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h6GFu5B20976; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:56:05 -0600 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:05:00 -0000 From: Rob Savoye To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, bug-dejagnu@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug-dejagnu] Re: AM33/2.0 support for mn10300-elf Message-ID: <20030716095605.G20162@welcomehome.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Alexandre Oliva on Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:59:48AM -0300 X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:59:48AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > These are the dejagnu bits, posted separately for convenience of the > > DejaGNU maintainer :-) Ok for the GDB repository? > > And here's a patch for am33_2.0-unknown-linux-gnu. It seems to be > lacking some love (setting compiler the way it does is odd, but I'm no > expert in this kind of file), and I'm not entirely sure we actually > use it any longer, but I thought I'd post it anyway. Should I put it > in? Well, the compiler name *should* really be gotten by transforming the target name, but I assume there was some reason for hardcoding it ? It looks like am33_2.0-linux-gnu isn't a standard target-triplet. What does config.guess return on this target ? find_gcc should have worked. As I'm guessing almost nobody uses this target, I'll check this into Savannah 'as is". - rob -