Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Per-objfile data mechanism
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030715161729.GA32437@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307131717.h6DHH425098569@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>

On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 07:17:04PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> This patch adds a per-objfile data mechanism to GDB, and uses that to
> store DWARF2 frame info instead of abusing objfile->sym_private.  The
> latter could lead to problems on certain platforms according to
> Daniel.

Cygwin appears to be affected by this, so we should definitely reach
some conclusion before 6.0.

> Comments?  OK to check this in?  Do we want this on the release branch
> too?

The concept is nice, but I share David's concern.  The way you
implemented this, every objfile always pays the cost of the extra
storage; there's an abstraction benefit, but a memory and simplicity
penalty.  I could go either way.

We should reach a decision one way or the other, though.  I needed a
new per-objfile datum just yesterday.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-15 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-13 17:17 Mark Kettenis
2003-07-15 15:55 ` David Carlton
2003-07-15 16:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-07-15 16:48   ` David Carlton
2003-07-15 17:27     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-10 19:03     ` Mark Kettenis
2003-08-11 15:45       ` David Carlton
2003-08-12 20:08         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-12 20:51           ` David Carlton
2003-08-21 22:42             ` Mark Kettenis
2003-09-07  4:26               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-13 20:54       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-07-15 17:14   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-15 20:00 ` Elena Zannoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030715161729.GA32437@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox