From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10440 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2003 17:58:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10383 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2003 17:58:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.49) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2003 17:58:07 -0000 Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-24-18-148.twcny.rr.com [24.24.18.148]) by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h6CHw3iY002628; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19bOdE-0000Eb-00; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:58:00 -0400 Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:58:00 -0000 To: zack@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [top level] autoconfiscate INSTALL usage Message-ID: <20030712175800.GA898@doctormoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 Zack said: >I've been wondering for years why GCC 'make install' never used the >perfectly good /usr/bin/install on Linux or Solaris. > >> +INSTALL_DATA = @INSTALL_DATA > >Typo - need a trailing @. Thanks for catching that. (Gah; I thought I'd looked at the resulting Makefile and it was OK... I guess I saw what I expected to see.) OK with that fix? >Do similar patches need to be put into the subdirectory Makefiles, or >do they just take the values of INSTALL_* passed down from the top >level? I think generally they just take the passed-down copies. -- Nathanael Nerode http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html