From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1179 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2003 22:44:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1169 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2003 22:44:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO are.twiddle.net) (64.81.246.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2003 22:44:24 -0000 Received: from are.twiddle.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by are.twiddle.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6AMiMLH020296; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:44:22 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by are.twiddle.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6AMiLM8020294; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:44:21 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: are.twiddle.net: rth set sender to rth@twiddle.net using -f Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 22:44:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Don't SEGV on invalid dwarf2 frame info Message-ID: <20030710224421.GB20109@twiddle.net> References: <20030710010318.GA3645@twiddle.net> <86wueqp075.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <16141.55923.596252.107277@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16141.55923.596252.107277@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:28:19PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > As is, the patch doesn't compile. Eh? Certainly it did. > I also think that there should be a check after reading the > initial_length, that such length is within the section. Oops. That got lost during a code rearrangement. I should put it back in... r~