From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30736 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2003 16:01:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30665 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 16:01:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jul 2003 16:01:12 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h62Fu8Eb002326; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:56:08 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h62Fu8HK025330; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:56:08 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h62Fu3oH025328; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 11:56:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 16:01:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200307021556.h62Fu3oH025328@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptype pattern Cc: carlton@kealia.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 drow> Could you try adding the .* from the following (kfail) pattern instead? drow> I.E. right after "int x;". Mmmm, no. I don't like ".*" in a PASS pattern. I admit it's kind of yucky to be too specific, but the yuckiness manifests as new FAILs when new compilers come out, which I can handle. With "int x;.*\\}" { pass ... }, we will get spurious passes if gcc or gdb breaks. Michael C