From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23033 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2003 16:34:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23026 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2003 16:34:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2003 16:34:14 -0000 Received: from dsl093-172-017.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.17] helo=nevyn.them.org ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19WIfN-000735-00 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:35:10 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19WIeI-0002Xt-00 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 12:34:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 16:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: "set logging" Message-ID: <20030628163402.GA9716@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030622205322.GA14138@nevyn.them.org> <20030623214822.GA12881@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030623214822.GA12881@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00848.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 05:48:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 04:53:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > As discussed earlier: > > set logging on [FILE] > > set logging off > > set logging overwrite [I changed the default to append] > > set logging redirect > > set logging file > > show logging > > > > I decided that one-off command logging was really a different class of thing > > from this patch, which is straight output logging, not really script-useful > > redirection. So that's gone. > > > > Is this OK? Any comments? Docs OK? > > Here's an update, based on feedback. Barring comments I'll commit it > in a couple of days to mainline, and next week to the branch. Feedback was positive, so it's in. I'll put it on the branch next week unless someone finds a problem. I'm flushing my 6.0 queue... I only have one more significant issue, but it will be a little while before I can get adequate test cases together. Still waiting for comments on the MI testsuite patch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer