From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31186 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2003 21:42:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5755 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2003 20:41:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2003 20:41:19 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 349B0D2DAF; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:42:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] Add documentation for the ``minimal'' language Message-ID: <20030625204119.GD11874@gnat.com> References: <20030613005945.GE947@gnat.com> <8582-Fri13Jun2003144152+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <20030624220155.GE7916@gnat.com> <7263-Wed25Jun2003074848+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <3EF99881.9080900@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EF99881.9080900@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00774.txt.bz2 > If Eli's ok, and the corresponding change is on the branch, then it > should definitly go into the branch. My thinking too, but I was applying the branch rule that says "only the foolish will use the obvious rule on the branch" :-). The doco change is now in, since the corresponding change was already in the branch. -- Joel