From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17440 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2003 04:04:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10170 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2003 04:00:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2003 04:00:20 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5N40JGp016210; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 23:00:19 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5N40Jns013199; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 23:00:19 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5N40JUN013198; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:00:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 04:04:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200306230400.h5N40JUN013198@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] selftest.exp: bump up initial line count Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00723.txt.bz2 drow> Could you try this more comprehensive patch? My testbed says it's okay on all configurations. I think it looks gross but it's okay with me considering where we are in the release cycle. (I have a big Analysis.txt file in progress. It had nine "To Be Investigated" left at lunchtime, and I still have five of them left and I'm falling asleep.) Let's throw it on the main line and if it looks all nice after my next spin. If it does, then it can go on the release branch. Michael C 2003-06-22 Michael Chastain Daniel Jacobowitz * gdb.base/selftest.exp (do_steps_and_nexts): Increase maximum initial line count of 'captured_main' from 26 to 32. (test_with_self): Allow xmalloc call to be interleaved with the preceding two lines.