From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24095 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2003 20:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23932 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2003 20:38:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2003 20:38:42 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5MKcdGp012179; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 15:38:39 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5MKcdns007601; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 15:38:39 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5MKcdqk007600; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:38:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 20:38:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200306222038.h5MKcdqk007600@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com, carlton@math.stanford.edu Subject: Re: stab at a fix for PR java/1039 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00711.txt.bz2 I don't know where that particular patch is at. Regarding PR 1039, I have a fresh testbed run here, and it says that the "break main; run" tests in jmisc1.exp and jmisc2.exp work in all the configurations I have with java (that is, with all gcc v3, but no gcc v2). So this will be gone from my next list of "5.3 versus HEAD" issues. And back in those long-ago days of February 2003 I wrote: mec> But this time we are going to go INTO mec> the branch cut with near release-quality already! mec> I'm excited! Ha ha ha, the naivete of youth. :) Michael C