Re: RFA: Actual support for tracing forks on GNU/Linux

Mark Kettenis
2003-08-10T16:11:57Z

Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:48:49 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>

Ping.

Sorry Daniel for not responding earlier. I've had almost no time to
spend on hacking since the second half of june and I've just returned
from a vacation in Finland. Anyway, I do have a few comments:

* I'm not very enthousiastic about the staggering of
CHILD_POST_STARTUP_INFERIOR and LINUX_CHILD_POST_STARTUP_INFERIOR,
especially since it infects i386-nat.c. However, I'm pretty sure
there isn't a better alternative that doesn't involve redisigning
the target vector :-(. I'd appreciate though if you could stick in
a comment somewhere that says this is really ugly.

* The changes to lin-lwp.c seem pretty much OK to me.

So I think this can go in.

Mark