From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25574 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2003 10:17:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25343 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2003 10:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO otisco.McKusick.COM) (209.31.233.190) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2003 10:17:10 -0000 Received: (from hilfingr@localhost) by otisco.McKusick.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5IAH2d00486; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:17:02 -0700 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200306181017.h5IAH2d00486@otisco.McKusick.COM> From: "Paul N. Hilfinger" To: stcarrez@nerim.fr CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3EEF8B41.30405@nerim.fr> (message from Stephane Carrez on Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:42:25 +0200) Subject: Re: [RFA]: Compile Ada language files in gdb Reply-to: Hilfinger@otisco.mckusick.com References: <3EEF8B41.30405@nerim.fr> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00592.txt.bz2 > The following patch adds the Ada specific files to gdb. > These files build completely and allow to have a support of Ada in gdb. Well, it's nice that they compile, but I fear this does not by itself enable Ada support. I know, we've been promising to get this fixed for awhile. Just a bit more patience, please. The last time I submitted a patch to start this process, the reviewer (Andrew?) suggested that it would be nice to keep Ada-specific tests out of generic files. This has turned out to be rather surprisingly involved, but that journey is now coming to an end. Paul Hilfinger