From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22056 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2003 17:59:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21580 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2003 17:58:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pindos.uoa.gr) (195.134.68.100) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2003 17:58:58 -0000 Received: from neutrino.particles.org (ppp-175.dialup.uoa.gr [195.134.69.175]) by pindos.uoa.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5BHwibE005147; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:58:45 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from anteater@localhost) by neutrino.particles.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5BHxWB01546; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:59:32 +0300 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:59:00 -0000 From: Elias Athanasopoulos To: Nick Clifton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Support for separate debug info files Message-ID: <20030611205932.A1317@neutrino.particles.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from nickc@redhat.com on Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:40:18AM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:40:18AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > This leads me to my main point. Do we need the ability to create > stripped debuginfo files ? The original patch did this, but it Imagine a LAN of users that occasionaly want to debug their apps. The debug info file can be in one machine, which can be retrieved by gdb via an NFS mount, and users can have their stripped apps in their local machines. Regards, Elias -- University of Athens I bet the human brain Physics Department is a kludge --Marvin Minsky