From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-25109-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7060 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2003 01:20:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7046 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2003 01:20:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2003 01:20:56 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged))
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5B1KuH10780
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:20:56 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5B1KrT04852;
	Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:20:53 -0400
Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5B1Kqw11677;
	Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:20:52 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5B1Kp029590;
	Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:20:51 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 01:20:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
   Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rfa] struct dictionary
Message-ID: <20030611012051.GB29565@redhat.com>
References: <ro1k7dbwprh.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <16101.3585.739945.993550@localhost.redhat.com> <ro1n0gp6fyf.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <16102.9919.32103.991732@localhost.redhat.com> <ro1wuft4vns.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ro1wuft4vns.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:47:19AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> That makes sense: an enum it is, then.  (And in a year or two, we can
> switch GDB over to C++, and have an actual boolean type, but never
> mind that.)

<stdbool.h>? 

Gcc has supported it for a long time (2.95, at least).  It's
got the C99 _Bool type.


r~