From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [commit] Split d10v-tdep.c into trad-frame.[hc]
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 16:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030608165800.GA15675@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EE36123.3020508@redhat.com>
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 12:15:31PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This moves a chunk of d10v's frame unwind code into trad-frame.[hc]. It
> creates a simple framework that traditional unwinders can use - a
> successor to get_frame_saved_regs().
>
> Handling the problem of the previous frame's PC being in this frame's LR
> is remarkably simple - just copy the saved location of LR into PC!
I like it. Just one complaint:
> +struct trad_frame
> +{
> + /* If non-zero (and regnum >= 0), the stack address at which the
> + register is saved. By default, it is assumed that the register
> + was not saved (addr == 0). Remember, a LONGEST can always fit a
> + CORE_ADDR. */
> + LONGEST addr;
> + /* else, if regnum >=0 (and addr == 0), the REGNUM that contains
> + this registers value. By default, it is assumed that the
> + registers are not moved (the register's value is still in that
> + register and regnum == the index). */
> + int regnum;
> + /* else, if regnum < 0, ADDR is the registers value. */
> +};
Gyuh? I looked at this for a couple of minutes and couldn't make heads
or tails of it until I went to look at trad-frame.c: this structure
isn't a frame at all, it's a single saved register. Could you rename
it, and update the comments?
I'm also not sure I understand all the combinations:
regnum < 0, addr is the register value
regnum >= 0 and addr 0, regnum holds the new register number (in the
next frame?)
regnum >= 0 and addr non-zero, addr is the save address - but what's
regnum mean? Nothing?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-08 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-08 16:15 Andrew Cagney
2003-06-08 16:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-06-08 17:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-08 17:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-08 22:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-08 22:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030608165800.GA15675@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox