From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11613 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2003 03:58:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11582 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2003 03:58:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO are.twiddle.net) (64.81.246.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2003 03:58:40 -0000 Received: from are.twiddle.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by are.twiddle.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h523wcLH007291; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:58:38 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by are.twiddle.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h523wclt007289; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:58:38 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: are.twiddle.net: rth set sender to rth@twiddle.net using -f Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 03:58:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] alpha_register_reggroup_p Message-ID: <20030602035838.GA7283@twiddle.net> References: <20030602032821.GA7199@twiddle.net> <3EDACA77.6050407@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EDACA77.6050407@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 11:54:31PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Should UNIQ be in save/restore (I don't know, I'm just asking)? I really have no idea. As far as I can tell, the default version just saved/restored all "real" registers, as opposed to those "pseudos" constructed by gdb. Is there some more specific meaning they should be interpreted with? If this is "the set of registers not to be clobbered when gdb does an inferior function call" I'd say, "probably". r~