From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 998 invoked by alias); 26 May 2003 19:57:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18587 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 19:52:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 May 2003 19:52:24 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19KO1d-0005hs-00; Mon, 26 May 2003 14:52:54 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19KO11-0006eZ-00; Mon, 26 May 2003 15:52:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 19:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PREPARE_TO_PROCEED; Was: More multi-arch and cleanups for m68k-linux Message-ID: <20030526195215.GA10404@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3ED26D96.9060306@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ED26D96.9060306@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 03:40:06PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >The only thing that prevents m68k-linux from advancing to multi-arch > >level 2 is the PREPARE_TO_PROCEED definition in config/nm-linux.h. > >How can this be multi-arched given that this is a native-only thing? > > I _think_ the current plan is along the lines of make > generic_prepare_proceed(?) the default, and leave HP/UX as the exception. > > Does the generic version work on GNU/Linux? (Hmm??? nothing appears to > currently use it!) What timing! This is almost to the top of my todo list to redo again... There were three targets using their own prepare to proceed, IIRC: mach3, hppa OSF, and HP/UX. Two of those are gone now. I believe that generic_prepare_to_proceed will not only work on GNU/Linux (it does), but that it will also work on HP/UX. I need to test this hypothesis. But what does the definition of PREPARE_TO_PROCEED in config/nm-linux.h have to do with multi-arching m68k now? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer