From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19720 invoked by alias); 17 May 2003 00:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19604 invoked from network); 17 May 2003 00:09:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2003 00:09:23 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id CC1A2D34B8; Fri, 16 May 2003 17:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 00:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: David Carlton Cc: Elena Zannoni , Daniel Jacobowitz , cagney@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy , Adam Fedor Subject: Re: [rfa] teach lookup_symbol about namespace scope Message-ID: <20030517000915.GO974@gnat.com> References: <20030424143356.GB7249@nevyn.them.org> <16068.64366.311139.220476@localhost.redhat.com> <16069.16926.467268.683535@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 Hi David, > Ada is weird, likes to do things its own way (it apparently handles > (de)mangled names in a completely different way from C++), and doesn't > even compile right now. If some Ada person wants to speak up and talk > about what Ada needs for language lookup, that would be great, but > otherwise I'm not going to worry about it. We are currently studying your design, and evaluating it with respect to Ada. We hope to be able to provide some feedback soon. Yeah, Ada does not compile. We are slowly making progress at getting our sources sorted out to help the merge. In the meantime, if you are interested in getting an ada-aware debugger, you can CVS checkout our sources. It's based on 5.3, and it's avail at http://libre.act-europe.fr/GDB/. -- Joel