Re: [RFA] Correct double negative in gdbint.texinfo

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:26:07AM -0700, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch is strictly a grammar change.
> 
> I'm not sure if "need not do anything" or "need do nothing" sounds
> better though.
> 
> Ok to commit?

OK as an obvious fix, thanks.  I think I prefer "need not do anything".

> 
> Ted Roth
> 2003-05-14  Theodore A. Roth  <troth@openavr.org>
> 
> 	* doc/gdbint.texinfo: Correct a double negative.
> 
> Index: doc/gdbint.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.144
> diff -u -r1.144 gdbint.texinfo
> --- doc/gdbint.texinfo	5 May 2003 17:56:57 -0000	1.144
> +++ doc/gdbint.texinfo	14 May 2003 17:55:56 -0000
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
>  breakpoints somehow; for instance, a ROM monitor may do its own
>  software breakpoints.  So although these are not literally ``hardware
>  breakpoints'', from @value{GDBN}'s point of view they work the same;
> -@value{GDBN} need not do nothing more than set the breakpoint and wait
> +@value{GDBN} need not do anything more than set the breakpoint and wait
>  for something to happen.
>  
>  Since they depend on hardware resources, hardware breakpoints may be


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer