From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12763 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 00:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12694 invoked from network); 10 May 2003 00:58:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2003 00:58:38 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19EIha-000518-00; Fri, 09 May 2003 19:59:02 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19EIh6-0008WA-00; Fri, 09 May 2003 20:58:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 00:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: "J. Johnston" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: nptl threading patch for linux Message-ID: <20030510005832.GB32695@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , "J. Johnston" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3EA84E74.3010101@redhat.com> <20030509220011.GA22383@nevyn.them.org> <3EBC2D6D.70001@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EBC2D6D.70001@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 06:36:29PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 04:52:04PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote: > > > >>The following is the last part of my revised nptl patch that has > >>been broken up per Daniel J.'s suggestion. There are no generated > >>files included in the patch. > > > > > >Well, this patch doesn't work for me :( Using 2.5.69, since I don't > >have any of the Red Hat kernels available here at the moment. It looks > >like GDB bellies up around the second thread creation. > > Hmm, I've a horrible feeling that people are going to get bogged down > trying to sort out which GLIBC and Kernel they should all use. > > Is there a list of Kernel and GLIBC fixes that are needed? I'm just using the most recent releases of NPTL and the Linux kernel, and the glibc CVS snapshot associated with that release of NPTL. Today it's 2.5.69-bk and 0.37. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer