From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4494 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 20:06:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4465 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 20:06:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (146.82.138.56) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2003 20:06:46 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19EE98-0004Wq-00; Fri, 09 May 2003 15:07:11 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19EE8h-0005og-00; Fri, 09 May 2003 16:06:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 20:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: GDB Subject: Re: PATCH: Make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created Message-ID: <20030509200643.GA22341@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "H. J. Lu" , GDB References: <20030509122434.A5769@lucon.org> <20030509193206.GA1189@nevyn.them.org> <20030509125943.A6257@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030509125943.A6257@lucon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 12:59:43PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 03:32:06PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 12:24:34PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > My gdb source tree is created with relative symlinks. ln -s won't work > > > with them. Here is a patch to make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created. > > > > That patch doesn't make sense. You're saying that ln -s can succeed > > when test -e would fail? > > > > I got > > # bash > # ln -s "doesn't exist" foo || echo bad > # test -e foo || echo "doesn't exist" > doesn't exist Sure, but then why would "ln" or "cp" work from "doesn't exist"? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer