From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16231 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 19:59:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16202 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 19:59:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc53.attbi.com) (204.127.198.39) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2003 19:59:45 -0000 Received: from lucon.org (12-234-88-5.client.attbi.com[12.234.88.5]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc53) with ESMTP id <2003050919594405300j374ce>; Fri, 9 May 2003 19:59:44 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D44352C681; Fri, 9 May 2003 12:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 19:59:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: GDB Subject: Re: PATCH: Make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created Message-ID: <20030509125943.A6257@lucon.org> References: <20030509122434.A5769@lucon.org> <20030509193206.GA1189@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030509193206.GA1189@nevyn.them.org>; from drow@mvista.com on Fri, May 09, 2003 at 03:32:06PM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00138.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 03:32:06PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 12:24:34PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > My gdb source tree is created with relative symlinks. ln -s won't work > > with them. Here is a patch to make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created. > > That patch doesn't make sense. You're saying that ln -s can succeed > when test -e would fail? > I got # bash # ln -s "doesn't exist" foo || echo bad # test -e foo || echo "doesn't exist" doesn't exist H.J.