From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10674 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2003 14:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10654 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2003 14:34:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 14:34:09 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 198hnh-0000LC-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:34:13 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 198hnQ-0003gl-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:33:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: David Carlton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni , Jim Blandy Subject: Re: [rfa] teach lookup_symbol about namespace scope Message-ID: <20030424143356.GB7249@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Carlton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni , Jim Blandy References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 06:24:43PM -0700, David Carlton wrote: > I think that's about it, though I'm probably forgetting something. > This needs symtab approval, though obviously I'd appreciate it if > Daniel could look it over as well. Tested on GCC 3.2, DWARF 2, > i686-pc-linux-gnu; no new regressions. (And I've been using a version > of this for months on my branch, too.) Would you add a test for successfully printing out a variable in namespace C in the second source file? I'm guessing from context that it will work now. Other than that, I like this patch from the C++ perspective. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer