From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13114 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 23:09:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13097 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 23:09:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 23:09:06 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 27FF0D34B8; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 23:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] test hand function call in commands list Message-ID: <20030416230905.GH1241@gnat.com> References: <20030414154048.GC1151@gnat.com> <20030416142321.GA7612@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030416142321.GA7612@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 > No; let's figure out what the new problem is first. After that let's > get the test in as quickly as possible so that we know if it breaks > again :) Sure. > I can reproduce this. It's even simpler; we aren't executing the > commands list even if if there's no inferior function call in them. > This appears to be specific to commands on a breakpoint hit during an > inferior function call. This is really bizarre. I do remember very clearly that removing the "silent" command in the commands list caused the breakpoint number to be printed. So it seemed that the commands where executed... > Did this ever work? Since Klee posted the patch, I was assuming that he had it working at some point. -- Joel